The 2016 Presidential campaign is entering uncharted territory. The two-year long front-runner candidate may go to jail after a sojourn to the White House.
That’s the bombshell divulged by two sources inside the F.B.I to Fox News journalist Bret Baier late Wednesday night.
Rank-and-files F.B.I agents who were digging the Clinton foundation for racketeering were told to stand down by Senior Justice Department officials when the Democratic presidential primary started last February. (1) According to the sources, the Clinton foundation investigation is far more ramified than anybody has reported so far and has been going on for more than a year.
Clinton assistants Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson laptops have not been destroyed in exchange for a quid pro quo offering them immunity. F.B.I agents have found classified emails from Clinton hacker-friendly server on Anthony Weiner’s laptop.
F.B.I sources say with 99% accuracy that Clinton private server has been hacked by at least five foreign intelligence agencies! More, Hillary email password was stolen when traveling to Russia as Secretary of State. (2)
On another note, State Department undersecretary for Management Patrick Kennedy has also entered in a quid pro quo bargain with F.B.I top officials offering them posts overseas where they are presently forbidden in exchange of stripping the classification of a secret document found on Hillary hacker-friendly server. A witness said that Kennedy was “pressured” to change the classification.
President Obama lied when he said on CBS that he learned about Clinton hacker-friendly server “the same time everybody else learned it, through news reports.” White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said that Obama communicated via email with Clinton while she used her personal email. (3)
Top democrat strategists such as Senator minority leader Harry Reid or John Podesta have only themselves to blame for trying to elect a candidate not only suspected of espionage but of racketeering.
F.B.I rank-and-files agents are replacing old famed reporters Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward in order to save the American democracy endangered by a vast left-wing racketeering organization. What are doing the reporters coming after the Watergate scandal? They are fawning lapdogs of dowager Hillary.
Reprint or redistribution of this copyrighted material is permitted with the following attribution and link : © Bernard Martoia for Dreuz.info.
Sources
(1) wsj.com
(2) nypost.com
(3) whitehouse.gov
Bernstein & Woodward helped the Dems get rid of Nixon with their articles and their book (“All the president’s men”).
They are now helping the Dem candidate. What’s new?
About the ^^ cartoon, what do you think would happen if an elected Clinton was indicted?
You said, “They are now helping the Dem candidate. What’s new?”
It proves that mainstream media is partisan and also that double standard is their rule. Their credibility is in tatters. That’s my point I am hammering to undecided voters. I believe that Watergate scandal would not have surfaced if Richard Nixon was a democrat. Shame to mainstream media!
Bret Baier is likely the most respected name in news. But how about treason? It might be the most serious accusation against Hillary yet http://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/756916?section=Headline&keywords=mike-mccaul-hillary-email-server&year=2016&month=11&date=03&id=756916&aliaspath=%2FManage%2FArticles%2FTemplate-Main
Annika,
Hillary Clinton can be prosecuted for Espionage Act, which includes high treason. She did not transmit secret documents to a foreign power, but she used a hacker-friendly server. The intent is different but the result is the same. Her intentional reckless behavior has put national security at risk. For that only reason, which does not include her mobster business at the Foundation, she should be jailed for the rest of her life
This is only peanuts. How about high treason, pure and simple? How about deliberately abandoning some 20 American people to the mercy of a mob of savages? The American people have yet to get answers about the Benghazi scandal.
(1) Why was it so imperative in the first place to oust Khadafi and set up a Consulate in volatile Libya where we were prevented from maintaining any military forces – therefore, unable to provide any security to our people ?
(2) And when the Consulate staff, sensing the danger, begged for protection, why was it refused?
(3) And by the way, who had the brilliant idea to send a notoriously gay Ambassador in a country where this kind of lifestyle is punishable by death?
(4) Was it the intelligence services that failed to provide the President with accurate information about the situation in Libya – or was the “President” and his Secretary of State unable to properly assess the information they received?
(5) And if the order to STAND DOWN – which meant: abandon the 20 or so people in the Consulate to the terrorists’ mercy – was issued unilaterally by a single, unprepared, unfit base commander, why has he remained unknown and unpunished?
(6) And why has the death of 4 Americans (and torture of one) by savage islamists also remained unpunished?
(7) Lastly, why, if everything was so simple and above board, all this ridiculous cock and bull story about an islamophobic video supposedly triggering a mob’s spontaneous attack, whereas it was the well organized and well armed members of al Qaeda who had actually decided to show us that they were still perfectly able to celebrate in their usual bloody way the anniversary of 9/11?
If Mrs. Clinton thinks the Banghazi scandal will fade away, she is sadly mistaken. We will know some day exactly what happened, hopefully not too late for her to get what she deserves.
Maybe a small breach in the Dem block:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/11/05/washington-state-elector-says-wont-vote-for-clinton.html