Pope Benedict XVI versus Mogul Harvey Weinstein

Cases of sexual abuse inside the Catholic Church dated back from the Middle Age but they only received huge media coverage after German Archbishop Joseph Ratzinger was elected Pope in 2005.

Ratzinger had two insufferable qualities. He was a conservative and a clever theologist who understood perfectly the clash of civilization prophesied by American political scientist Samuel Huntington twenty years ago. In his Regensburg address on September 12, 2006, he quoted the Byzantine Emperor Paleologus in a 1391 dialogue with a Persian. “Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new and there you will find things only bad and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached.”

Ratzinger’s foreboding and comparison with the defunct Byzantine Empire proved accurate when hordes of Muslims swarmed into Europe with the blessing of German chancellor Angela Merkel in September 2015.

I recently wrote an article “Who Remember the Kerkoporta?”, which related the taking of Constantinople by the Janissaries of Sultan Mehmet II on May 29, 1453. (1)

Telling the truth about Islam triggered an outrage across the world, and Pope Benoit XVI was condemned forcefully by mainstream media journalists who played useful idiots described by the communist propaganda.

On October 1, 2006, BBC retaliated to the Regensburg address with a documentary film by Colm O’Gorman called “Sex Crimes and the Vatican.” (2) O’Gorman is the executive director of Amnesty International Ireland. He was raped by a Catholic priest in Ireland when he was twelve years old. The documentary divulged a Vatican secret document Crimen Sollicitationis, which silenced allegations of sexual abuses by clergymen. The policy was enforced by Joseph Ratzinger when he was the Prefect of the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. (1981-2005)

After that damaging documentary produced by the BBC, mainstream media entered the fray. In the US, cases of sexual abuses resulted in stratospheric settlements with claimants. The Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Los Angeles reached a $ 600 million agreement with 500 alleged victims. (3) The innuendo of claimants bled to death the Roman Catholic Church, and many dioceses went under bankruptcy protection.

The dire situation of the Roman Catholic Church was a bonanza for an axis of evil who wanted to overthrow the conservative Pope Benedict XVI, and replace him by the radical archbishop of Buenos Aires Jorge Bergoglio.

In a letter to President Donald Trump that was sent on Inauguration Day, five signatories claimed, “Specifically, we have reason to believe that a Vatican regime change was engineered by the Obama administration.” The coup d’Etat was hatched by billionaire George Soros, President Barack Obama, Vice-President Joe Biden, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and her longtime adviser John Podesta. The signatories of the letter said that they used intelligence agencies, diplomatic machinery, political muscle, and financial power to coerce the Pope Benedict XVI. (4)

The axis of evil wanted the demise of the “Middle Age dictatorship” in the Catholic Church. John Podesta, a longtime Clinton advisor, whose emails were divulged later by Wikileaks, was working with other activists to enhance a “Catholic Spring” revolution within the Catholic Church, in the same manner that they fomented a disastrous “Arab Spring” that destabilized Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, and Syria in 2011.

In the Roman tradition, a Pope leads his mission to his death, but Benedict XVI invoked his frail health in his sudden resignation on February 11, 2013. The news came as a shock to the 1.2 billion Catholics. It was the first time that a pope renounced his apostolic mission since Benedict IX resigned, for a large sum of money, in 1042. Almost five years after his resignation, Joseph Ratzinger is well alive, and his health does not interest any more mainstream media.

In late October 2012, after my comeback from the woods on the Appalachian Trail, I spent a couple of days in Larchmont, a suburb of New York City before returning to France. I was introduced by a friend of mine to Michel Perez, a polyglot man speaking seven languages. He informed me casually that he was a member of a team led by the UN, which was auditing the Vatican bank. I did not connect the dots when I learned it.

One name not mentioned in the axis of evil, but certain to surface as a key culprit in a congressional or judicial inquiry, is former chairman of Goldman Sachs International Peter Sutherland. He was brought in to help “reform” the Vatican bank. It was akin to putting Dracula in charge of the blood bank.

Sutherland was also the United Nations Special Representative of the Secretary-General for International Migration until March 2017. He is also a member of the Migration Advisory Board of the International Organization for Migration. All the dots are flashing that the invasion of Europe by Muslim migrants was planned carefully by those international organizations.

Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein indulged in sexual assaults of young females, but his criminal records remained under radar screen for a quarter of century.

Why is he making the headlines today?

Weinstein believes in an echo to his close friend Hillary Clinton’s notorious claim that he is a victim of a “vast right-wing conspiracy.” He believes that a team of lawyers linked to conservative groups has been digging up dirt on him. Irony of history, Weinstein bragged to his poor victims that he was above the law. He used non-disclosure agreements, monetary payoffs, and legal threats to silence them. He also removed them from his projects or dissuaded people to hire them. He also bragged about planting items in media outlets about those who spoke against him. Ambra Battilana Guttierez was smeared by gossip media after she reported to the New York City Police Department that she had been groped by Weinstein.

Contrary to his allegations, Weinstein is not the victim of a vast-right conspiracy, but the culprit of sexual assaults that are made public by braver women who dare to testify their suffering.

This has been an open secret to many people in Hollywood and beyond, but nobody wanted to play David against Goliath. Weinstein is a powerful mogul, a big man whose corpulence frightened his preys. He also used his influence to silence witnesses and whistle-blowers.

The list is long of films featuring the Catholic Church, as a totalitarian and dark institution willing to resort to murder to hide its secrets. It started in 2006 with the movie adaptation of best-seller book “Da Vinci Code,” a mystery detective novel by Dan Brown, and culminated when “Spotlight” won the best motion picture by the Academy Awards in 2015.

Weinstein’s sexual rampage is a case of the bitter bit for Hollywood. It is also a reminder of the close link between the Hollywood mogul and his friends in the Democratic Party. Photos of Weinstein with Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are embarrassing today for those who begged his money.

When the blood bath was streaming in the streets of Las Vegas, it took only five minutes for Hillary Clinton to exploit that drama for her own political agenda. On the other hand, it took her five days for saying in her interview with CNN’s Fareed Zakaria. “I was appalled. It was something that was just intolerable in every way. And, you know, like so many people who’ve come forward and spoken out, this was a different side of a person who I and many others had known in the past.” Hillary Clinton pretended not to know Weinstein’s sexual rampage. That’s was her sole concern. When she was the First Lady, she resorted to the same legal threat made by Weinstein in order to silence the victims sexually assaulted by her husband.

In September after the release of “What Happened” published by Simon & Schuster, Hillary Clinton toured the country in order to promote the book. She never told the public that she did not write it. It was penned by her speechwriter Dan Schwerin.

Her touring for the promotion of the book written by Dan Schwerin was not her first liar. The Washington Post rectified her pretense when “Hard Choices” was released in 2014. (5)

“Hillary Rodham Clinton has written a new book. Except maybe she hasn’t. It all depends on what the definition of “written” is. The former first lady, U.S. senator and secretary of state had some help on her new memoir, “Hard Choices.” Clinton employed a phalanx of aides and associates in producing the volume, which is being released Tuesday. But don’t expect to hear much about Clinton’s “book team,” as she calls those who helped her write the book, which carries her name alone on its cover. Clinton’s acknowledgment of her three-man team — Dan Schwerin, a former Senate and State Department aide to Clinton; Ethan Gelber, another State Department aide; and Ted Widmer, a Clinton adviser and Brown University historian — appears in just a few sentences on Page 597 of the 635-page book. Their exact contributions, however, are not spelled out.”

Hillary Clinton blamed FBI director James Comey and Russian President Vladimir Putin for her defeat in the presidential election. She will never admit that she lost it because she is considered as a compulsive liar by a majority of American voters.

Expect that Hillary will launch a third presidential campaign bid because she has a loyal grassroots in Hollywood. However, this campaign will not be paid by Harvey Weinstein this time; it is the sole certainty in the new screenplay, which will be released after the mid-term elections in 2018.

Reprint or redistribution of this copyrighted material is permitted with the following attribution and link: © Bernard Martoia for Dreuz.info.